Where Did Our Love Go: Postcritique and the Crisis of Literary Studies

  • Dunja Dušanić Faculty of Philology University of Belgrade
Keywords: postcritique, contemporary literary criticism, impressionist criticism, methodology of literary studies, Rita Felski (1956–), Tzvetan Todorov (1939–2017)

Abstract

This article offered a brief, mid-2020s reassessment of the key concepts, theoretical arguments, and critical assumptions articulated by Rita Felski in her most influential books, The Uses of Literature (2008) and The Limits of Critique (2015) and in the volume she co-edited with Elizabeth S. Anker, Critique and Postcritique (2017). It reevaluated the accomplishments and practical implications of postcritique by placing Felski’s critical approach within the broader context of the (still ongoing) methodological and institutional crisis of literary studies in the United States and Europe. The distinctiveness and gravity of the present crisis were then reexamined by drawing parallels to the crisis of historicism at the end of the 19th century and its resolution in the first decades of the 20th century. The American postcritical moment was also interpreted as a national manifestation of a global crisis and compared to similar discussions in France from 2000 to 2010. This dual contextualization revealed a more or less consistent transhistorical and transnational pattern that warrants further, comparative study. Finally, the article argued that the current crisis has often been misdiagnosed, with its distinct aspects frequently conflated and suggested reasons why the proposed solutions have fallen short.   

References

Alidini, Stefan. "Čemu još književna kritika?". Književna istorija 55.179 (2023): 297-304.

Anker, Elizabeth S. & Rita Felski (prir.) Critique and Postcritique. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373049

Audrerie, Sabine. "Quel avenir pour la littérature? Tzvetan Todorov et François Bégaudeau s'interrogent sur le rôle de la littérature et sur l' enseignement du français". la-Croix.com, 10. 1. 2007. Preuzeto sa: https://www.la-croix.com/Audios/Entretien-croise-de-Tzvetan-Todorov-et-Francois-Begaudeau-Quel-avenir-pour-la-litterature-_NG_-2007-02-06-519031. Poslednji put pristupljeno: 6. 12. 2024.

Babbitt, Irving. "Impressionist versus Judicial Criticism". PMLA 21. 3 (1906): 687-705. https://doi.org/10.2307/456769

Baldick, Chris. Criticism and Literary Theory 1890 to the Present. London: Longman, 1996.

Barthes, Roland. Sur Racine. Paris: Seuil, 1963.

Best, Stephen & Sharon Marcus. "Surface Reading: An Introduction". Representations 108. 1 (2009): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2009.108.1.1

Bloom, Harold. How to Read and Why. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.

Bloom, Harold. The Western Canon. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1994.

Citton, Yves. "Il faut défendre la société littéraire". Revue Internationale des livres et des idées 5 (2008): 5-10. Preuzeto sa: http://www.fabula.org/revue/document4299.php. Poslednji put pristupljeno: 6. 12. 2024. https://doi.org/10.58282/acta.4299

Citton, Yves. L' avenir des humanités. Économie de la connaissance ou cultures de l'interprétation? Paris: La Découverte, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.citto.2010.01

Citton, Yves. Lire, interpréter, actualiser. Pourquoi les études littéraires? Paris: Éditions Amsterdam, 2007.

Collectif. "C' est la littérature qu'on assassine rue de Grenelle", Le Monde, 4. 3. 2000. Preuzeto sa https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/2000/03/04/c-est-la-litterature-qu-on-assassine-rue-de-grenelle_3684353_1819218.html, poslednji put pristupljeno: 6. 12. 2024.

Compagnon, Antoine. La littérature, pour quoi faire? Paris: Fayard, Collège de France, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cdf.524

Compagnon, Antoine. Le démon de la théorie. Paris: Seuil, 1998.

Felski, Rita. Granice kritike. Prev. Anera Ryznar. Zagreb: Meandarmedia, 2019.

Felski, Rita. Namjene književnosti. Prev. Vladimir Cvetković Sever. Zagreb: Jasenski i Turk, 2016.

Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226294179.001.0001

Felski, Rita. Uses of Literature. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302790

Gates, Lewis. "Impressionism and appreciation". Studies and Appreciations. New York & London: Macmillan, 1900, 205-236.

Genette, Gérard. Figures III. Paris: Seuil, 1972.

Glicksberg, Charles I. "I. A. Richards and the Science of Criticism". The Sewanee Review 46. 4 (1938): 520-33.

Graff, Gerald. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987.

Guillory, John. "Literary Study and the Modern System of the Disciplines". Disciplinarity at the Fin de Siècle. Prir. Amanda Anderson & Joseph Valente. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691227559-003

Guillory, John. Professing Criticism: Essays on the Organization of Literary Study. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226821313.001.0001

Heller, Nathan. "The End of the English Major", The New Yorker, 27. 2. 2023. Preuzeto sa: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/06/the-end-of-the-english-major. Poslednji put pristupljeno: 6. 12. 2024.

Izvori iz štampe i elektronski izvori

Jouve, Vincent. Pourquoi enseigner la littérature aujourd'hui? Paris: Armand Colin, 2010.

Lanson, Gistav. "Metoda istorije književnosti". Putevi 4 (1966): 633-651.

Lanson, Gustave. Méthodes de l'histoire littéraire. Paris: Société d'édition "Les Belles-lettres", 1925.

Louis, Annick. Sans objet? Pour une épistémologie de la discipline littéraire. Paris: Éditions Hermann, 2021. https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9791037020468

Macé, Marielle. Façons de lire, manières d'être. Paris: Gallimard, 2011.

Maingueneau, Dominique. Contre Saint-Proust ou la fin de la littérature. Paris: Belin, 2006.

Marx, William. L' adieu à la littérature. Histoire d'une dévalorisation XVIIIe-XXe siècle. Paris: Minuit, 2006.

Marx, William. La haine de la littérature. Paris: Minuit, 2015.

North, Joseph. Literary Criticism: A Concise Political History. Boston, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674978522

Nusbaum, Marta. Ne za profit: zašto je demokratiji potrebna humanistika? Prev. Ana Jovanović i Rastislav Dinić. Beograd: Fabrika knjiga, 2012.

Repères et références statistiques sur les enseignements, la formation et la recherche, Édition 2023. Preuzeto sa sajta Ministarstva prosvete Francuske: https://www.education.gouv.fr/reperes-et-references-statistiques-2023-378608. Poslednji put pristupljeno 6. 12. 2024.

Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. Petite écologie des études littéraires. Pourquoi et comment étudier la littérature? Vincennes: Éditions Thierry Marchaisse, 2011.

Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. "Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or, You're So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay Is About You". Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002, 123-151. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384786-005

Skerlić, Jovan. "Dogmatička i impresionistička kritika". Pisci i knjige tom 4. Beograd: Nova štamparija "Davidović", 1909, 1-22.

Sontag, Susan. Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1966.

Stonor Saunders, Frances. The Cultural Cold War, the CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. New York: The New Press, 2013.

Todorov, Tzvetan. La littérature en péril. Paris: Flammarion, "Café Voltaire", 2007.

Viart, Dominique i Laurent Demanze (prir.) Fins de la Littérature, Tome 1. Esthétiques et discours de la fin. Paris: Armand Colin, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.viar.2012.01.0009

Viart, Dominique i Laurent Demanze (prir.) Fins de la Littérature, Tome 2. Historicité de la littérature contemporaine. Paris: Armand Colin, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.viar.2012.01.0009

Warner, Michael. "Uncritical Reading". Polemic: Critical or Uncritical. Prir. Jane Gallop. New York: Routledge, 2004, 13-38.

Published
2025-02-03
Section
Terminological guide